Another new treatment for psoriasis is in the pipeline.

Quote:

---

DURECT Corporation today announced it has commenced patient dosing in a Phase 2a proof-of-concept trial with topical DUR-928 in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis.  DUR-928, the lead investigational product in the Company's Epigenetic Regulator Program, is an endogenous, first-in-class small molecule, which may have broad applicability in chronic hepatic diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), acute organ injuries such as alcoholic hepatitis (AH) and acute kidney injury (AKI), and in inflammatory skin disorders such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

"As topical agents continue to be the mainstay of treatment for patients suffering from mild to moderate plaque psoriasis, especially localized plaque psoriasis, it is important to investigate a topical agent with a novel mechanism of action," stated Dr. Howard Maibach, Professor of Dermatology at the University of California San Francisco.  "Should the results be positive, DUR-928 should be studied in additional inflammatory skin diseases."

"Commencing patient dosing in this proof-of-concept psoriasis trial is an important milestone in line with our focus for DUR-928 in 2019, which is to produce data with the potential to create significant commercial and partnering value," said James E. Brown, President and CEO of DURECT.

In this Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled proof-of-concept clinical trial, DUR-928 will be applied topically once-daily for four weeks in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. The trial is being conducted at multiple clinical sites in the U.S.  Twenty patients are planned to be enrolled to obtain approximately 15 evaluable patients. Patients will serve as their own controls, applying DUR-928 to the plaque on one arm and the vehicle to a similar plaque on the other arm. After the treatment period, patients will be followed for an additional four weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint will be change in local psoriasis scores from baseline in the DUR-928-treated plaques compared to that in the vehicle-treated plaques. We expect to announce top line data from this study in the second half of 2019.

DURECT previously conducted an exploratory Phase 1b trial in psoriasis patients (9 evaluable patients) in Australia.  The trial was randomized, double-blinded, placebo and self-controlled, using a micro-plaque assay with intralesional injections of DUR-928.  The results were encouraging and warranted advancing into the current proof-of-concept trial with topically applied DUR-928.

Hi everyone,

Thank you so much for the warm welcome, it is great to finally find somewhere I can discuss Psoriasis with people that understand and have been through the same trials and tribulations.

The great news for me is that I have now completed week 5 of my Cosentyx and the result is amazing. I would say I am now almost 85-90% clear and feel so much better for it.

The injection pens are pretty much painless and  after the second go you get completely used to whole process (which takes seconds) and minor pinch/scratching feeling when administering.

I am due to have my first bloods (which are a little late) to ascertain there is nothing of concern internally. I did feel like I had a little chesty cough but that to me is a minor issue which has pretty much gone. I do plan on relaying any side effects to my consultant when I have the check-ups. I think I have some anxiety around having bloods in case my body isn't tolerating the medication but I recognise this is natural (working in mental health is beneficial) so I don't catastrophise about this.

Sorry to blabber, I will up date again in around a month,

Cheers

Leo Pharma announced they will start a clinical trial of microarray patches for the local intradermal treatment of psoriasis.

Quote:

---

Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG (LTS), a market leader in transdermal therapeutic systems, and LEO Pharma A/S, a global leader in dermatology, today announced that the companies will start the clinical trial of microarray patches for the local intradermal treatment of psoriasis. The study will start in April 2019 with expected completion later this year and the aim of the study is to document safety and efficacy in patients.

A microarray patch (also known as a microneedle patch) is a polymeric, microscopic array which delivers encapsulated drugs by perforating the outer stratum corneum with numerous microneedles. The needles are biodegradable and will dissolve as they release the drug in the skin.

This is the first time that microarray patch technology is applied to psoriasis treatment, representing a novel dosage form with several potential benefits for patients: The microarray patch enables slow release of the drug (betamethasone and calcipotriol), which means that treatment frequency can potentially be reduced from one or more times daily to once weekly. Furthermore the patch may reduce or potentially eliminate the need for application of topicals such as ointments. Application of the patch is precise due to the small size of the micro needles ensuring that only affected skin is treated.

The micro array patch for psoriasis treatment has been developed jointly between LEO Pharma and LTS’ laboratories and has Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) status. The project is the first result of a partnership agreement which the two companies entered in 2016.

"After a successful preclinical development in the last two years, initiating a human study in corporation with LEO Pharma is the next major milestone. Our Micro Array Patch (MAP) platform allows the active ingredient to be released directly into the skin MAP innovation is driven by a productive and constructive cooperation using core competences of LEO Pharma and LTS," said Stefan Henke, Head of LTS‘s Innovative Injection Systems Unit.

"Our alliance with LTS is a great example of LEO Pharma’s innovative approach to psoriasis treatment and how we collaborate to improve and extend what’s possible for the benefit of patients. The microarray patch represents a new treatment method, which we believe has the potential to improve both treatment compliance and convenience – thus helping even more patients achieve healthy skin," said Kim Kjøller, Executive Vice President, LEO Pharma Research & Development.

This study looked at the three biological treatments available for children with psoriasis.

Quote:

---

Background:
Three biotherapies – etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab – are licensed in childhood psoriasis. The few data available on their efficacy and tolerance are mainly derived from industry trials. However, biological drug survival impacts long‐term performance in real‐life settings.

Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival rates of biological therapies in children with psoriasis in real‐life conditions. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the factors associated with the choice of the biological therapy and to report severe adverse events.

Materials and methods:
This study was an observational retrospective study. Data were extracted from the clinical records of 134 children. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to analyse drug survival overall and in subgroups of plaque psoriasis, bio‐naïve, and non‐naïve patients.

Results:
We analysed 184 treatment courses: 70 with etanercept, 68 with adalimumab, and 46 with ustekinumab. Factors associated with the choice of first‐line biological agent were age at initiation (younger for adalimumab, p<0.0001), age at onset of psoriasis (younger for adalimumab and etanercept, p=0.03), and baseline PASI and PGA (both higher for adalimumab, p<0.001). Drug survival rates were higher for ustekinumab than for adalimumab and etanercept (p<0.0001) for all treatment and all psoriasis types, plaque‐type psoriasis (p=0.0003), patients naïve for biological agents (p=0.0007), and non‐naïve patients (p=0.007). We reported eight SAEs: severe infections (n=3), significant weight gain (n=2), psoriasis flare (n=1), and malaise (n=1). Biological therapy was discontinued in three children (one with psoriasis flare and two with weight gain). Only the two cases of weight gain resulted in an unfavourable outcome.

Conclusions:
Our real‐life comparative study found that UST had the best drug survival outcome. The profile of SAEs in children was comparable to that in adults. These results will assist dermatologists in the decision‐making process when choosing treatment options for children with psoriasis in daily practice.

I'm still waiting for everything to go through but thought I would share my process here in case someone finds it helpful.

So, right after the doctor prescribed Cosentyx, the first step was blood work. Since I had my yearly check up they were able to get most of what they needed from my primary doctor, however they still needed a couple of more tests. So got that done and the doctor prescribed Costenyx.

I am in the United States, and have commercial primary insurance (through my husband's work) which is also where our prescription insurance comes from.

I received a call at the end of last week from a specialty pharmacy (we'll just call them Pharmacy A) letting me know they were handling the prescription. Today they called to tell me that I needed to call Cosentyx and join their co-pay program. I thought uh oh we most likely will not qualify but I called them and they really didn't ask me too many questions, NOTHING about income. So they signed me up and also on a secondary credit type (no, not the kind you have to pay back but the kind that if my insurance plus the co pay doesn't pay it all then the credit one will pay the balance) So, I call back Pharmacy A to give them the information. A very short time later, our prescription insurance company called (we'll just call them PIC for short) and informs me that pharmacy A is not in their network so I have to use specialty pharmacy B. Also, PIC informs me I need to call "save on" and get an exemption. Say what? So I call pharmacy A to make sure they know and yes, they already knew and was preparing to send my information to pharmacy B. So I call Save on and tell them I was told to call and why. They explain that it is part of my insurance perk, basically my co pay is a bit over $1300 per 300 mg and that the Cosentyx co pay program will pay half and that the credit program pays the other half but that the save on ensures that if for some reason there is a problem then Save On will pay meaning my cost will never be over $0.00. I guess it's insurance for my insurance But no matter, as long as they don't expect me to pay out that much!

So for all those thinking (like myself) that they would not be able to get assistance, always check to make sure because it seems you just never know!


I used some Taclonex over the weekend as my scalp was just bothering me too much. One application and a definite improvement, too bad it's a steroid ointment. I REALLY didn't want to use it as I used it prior to Stelara and cleared quite a bit which made it difficult to tell how much Stelara was helping right off. I also didn't want things to get worse but I'm hoping I don't have to continue with the Taclonex while waiting for Cosentyx (which should be soon now)

So things are on track it seems. I'll update when I get the call to set up my first round along with a picture for reference.

I have a question....
I have done numerous searches online but can't seem to find an answer....

I have been on oral mtx for over a year, and I am finding that my finger joints are becoming inflamed and distorted (mostly over the past 6 months or so.) I am also beginning to get skin plaques again after being completely clear for over 10 years.
How long is long enough to know for sure that the dose/medication is not working?

I have an appt with my new rheumy coming up, and I want to get off mtx due to side effects and my belief it isn't working for me but my gp, dermy and rheumy keep urging me to stay on it. Why, when I am obviously haging issues?

So far, I have found online sites saying 3 months, 6 months, one year and 3 years are all acceptable time frames.
Very confusing!

I cannot find an Australian site that gives clear information. How am I supposed to advocate for myself if I don't have the info?

Please help.

Hi! My name is Dani. I am 18 years old and I have Scalp Psoriasis.

I grew up in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan but I am currently in the Philippines studying. The first time I noticed flaky patches on my scalp was about 8 months ago when I was still in Japan. I had an auntie who works at a derma clinic and provided me topical creams to cure it so I never had to buy one from the drugstore. It worked and everything was okay, until February this year.

The heat's too strong here in the Philippines so I decided to tie my hair up in a bun. My blockmate noticed flaky patches and asked me what they were and I was so embarassed. ?

I did a little google search and found this forum and it looks like everyone here is nice and friendly so I am trying my luck here. 

I never bothered to take note of what cream I was using back when I was still in Japan. I wonder if you guys can help me what name of topical cream to buy here in the Philippines? I'm a student and I don't have extra money to have myself checked more so purchase the oral medicine they'll prescribe.

I am hoping you can help me. Thank you! ??

Hello everyone. I’m from the State of Georgia in the USA. I’m excited to be a part of this fourm. I was first diagnosed with PsA back in 2016. After Methotrexate and Enbrel failed me, my Rhematologist prescribed Cosentyx. I injected 150 mg last Friday. On Saturday out of know where I became so overwhelmed that I was going to pass out. It was so scary. Then I had bad stomach pains and cramps. Then here comes the diarrhea. I started to feel a little better until about 10 minutes later ... this horrible nausea came over me. I projectile threw up  2 times then this extreme fatigue set in that lasted 2 days. I was curious if anyone else has had these side effects? I’m hoping that was a one time thing. Thank you!

Hi Everyone,

So I have suffered with Psoriasis for around 5 years but my diagnosis was made 4 years ago (ish).

I have tried all of the recommended Creams and tablets such as Methotrexate, Cyclosporine, Apremilast and Acitretin.

Some of the above tablets worked a little, my main issue has pretty much been the side effects of the tablets, ranging from dark thoughts on the Apremilast to Nausea and sick feeling on the Methotrexate. (Bear in mind this is just my experience on the tablets and I am sure not everyone will have the same reaction).

I have recently started on Cosentyx and am on Week 3 of the weekly two 150mg injections (you have a weekly two injections for five weeks and then go monthly).

My skin has already started to clear up, Psoriasis fading massively, I take the medication on a Tuesday, yesterday (Wednesday) after my third dosage I did fairly quickly start to have a sore throat, coldy like symptoms and a runny nose. 

I have to say I felt similarly this morning but this afternoon after plenty of water and food I feel loads better. I am happy to keep everyone posted on my progress as my treatment progresses. I am remaining positive this works for me and am keeping my fingers crossed,

Alex

Boehringer Ingelheim present data showing that their "BI 655130" a monoclonal antibody that blocks the action of the interleukin-36 receptor (IL-36R) showed significantly improved symptoms of generalised pustular psoriasis.

Quote:

---

New data from a Phase I clinical trial showed BI 655130, a first-in-class investigational treatment, significantly improved symptoms of generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP), a rare form of psoriasis.

BI 655130 is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the action of the interleukin-36 receptor (IL-36R), a signalling pathway within the immune system that may play a role in many inflammatory diseases.

The newly published clinical data, indicate that BI 655130 rapidly improved symptoms in seven patients with GPP, who were experiencing acute moderate or severe disease flares.  Five of seven patients in the 20-week, Phase I clinical trial achieved clear or almost clear skin within the first week, following a single dose of treatment, and all patients achieved this outcome after four weeks. The average improvement in patients’ skin symptoms was close to 80 per cent at week four and was maintained until the end of the study (week 20).

“The tailored targeting of the IL-36 pathway is one of the most exciting new areas in dermatology research, and progress in this mechanism has been eagerly anticipated by the scientific community,” commented the trial’s principal investigator, Professor Hervé Bachelez, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France. “This trial provides long-awaited clinical data that demonstrates the positive effect of blocking IL-36 action as a potential, novel treatment approach. The rapid improvement seen in patients from just a single dose of BI 655130 show strong potential for the future treatment of GPP.”

The rare skin disease, GPP, is a chronic condition that is distinct from the more common condition, plaque psoriasis.  It has a considerable impact on people’s quality of life. The skin becomes red and erupts into numerous blisters of non-infectious pus (pustules), covering wide areas of the body.  People who develop GPP may experience an abrupt onset of fever, chills and painful skin lesions. GPP may be associated with life-threatening organ failure and infectious complications, and, therefore, should be considered a medical emergency. Available treatment options for GPP are extremely limited and lack profound and persistent efficacy. Therefore, there is a strong need for new treatment options for GPP with rapid, strong and persistent efficacy.

“BI 655130 is a novel antibody discovered by Boehringer Ingelheim and is being investigated for the treatment of multiple inflammatory diseases in the hope of transforming the care currently available for these patients,” said Dr Jan Poth, Therapeutic Area Head, CNS and Immunology at Boehringer Ingelheim.

“We are one of the first companies to focus on targeting IL-36 in dermatology, a reflection of our long-term commitment to researching and developing transformative medicines for patients where there is still high unmet need. Due to its potential, we are moving to the next phase of clinical trials, involving larger numbers of patients with GPP. Trials of BI 655130 are also underway in other immune related conditions, such as palmo-plantar pustulosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and atopic dermatitis,” continued Poth.

I found this forum by accident while searching for information and communities on PsA and psoriasis.
I am almost 51 years old and have had plaque psoriasis from the age of 2. Recently sortof diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis within the last 18 months - I say sortof, because I have had various diagnosis from a few different doctors but no definitive dx from any of them.
My skin has been clear of plaques for over 10 years, but I have distal joint deformities, nail issues, slight joint pain, and a whole slew of what I now know are possible comorbidities (early onset osteopenia, anaemia, skin cancer, etc).
I was prescribed sulfasalazine by my dermatologist which did nothing, and have been on methotrexate for over a year which also seems to not be working.
After pushing hard with my GP, I am finally seeing a rheumatologist.
Sadly, it has been a very difficult issue trying to find cohesive and complete information in Australia about psoriatic arthritis..... I have literally been forced to make a chart to connect all the little fragments of info I have found over the past couple of years.

I am hoping that this forum will give me ideas and information that will help me be the best advocate I can be for myself moving forward.
Looking to live my best possible life as I progress!

Thankyou for reading.

fialstar

This large study of psoriasis patients in Italy suggests Pruritus should be evaluated during consultations.

Quote:

---

Background:
Psoriasis (Ps) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease associated with pruritus in 64‐98% of patients. However, few modestly sized studies assess factors associated with psoriatic pruritus.

Objective:
To investigate factors associated with Ps pruritus intensity.

Methods:
Psoriasis patients 18 years or older seen in one of 155 centers in Italy between September 2005 and 2009 were identified from the Italian PsoCare registry. Patients without cutaneous psoriasis and those with missed information on pruritus were excluded.

Results:
We identified 10,802 patients, with a mean age 48.8±14.3 years. Mild itch was present in 33.2% of patients, moderate in 34.4%, severe in 18.7% and very severe in 13.7%. Higher itch intensity was associated with female gender, lower educational attainment compared to university degree, pustular psoriasis, psoriasis on the head, face, palmoplantar areas, folds and genitalia, more severe disease, disease duration <15 years, and no or few prior systemic treatments.

Limitations:
Effects of specific medication on itch were not assessed.

Conclusions:
Pruritus should be evaluated during psoriasis visits, and physicians should be aware of patients at higher risk for itch. Further studies are needed to assess the effects of medications on itch, and establish therapy for psoriasis patients with persistent itch.

Another good result for Cosentyx (secukinumab).

Quote:

---

Novartis announced today new data in 441 Chinese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis from a Phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of Cosentyx (secukinumab). The data, part of a broader ongoing 52 week Phase III study in 543 patients, show 97.7% of patients treated with Cosentyx 300mg achieved PASI 75 and 80.9% achieved PASI 90 by week 12, with 87% of patients reaching PASI 90 by week 16. In patients treated with Cosentyx 150mg, 87.8% achieved PASI 75 and 66.4% achieved PASI 90 at week 12.

"Cosentyx continues to deliver what psoriasis patients need - reimagining care to provide clear skin and a complete treatment," said Eric Hughes, Global Development Unit Head, Immunology, Hepatology and Dermatology, and China Region Development Head. "We're excited to report for the first time data for a Chinese population, and to see strong support from the data for Cosentyx."

Cosentyx is backed by a wealth of research with 100 studies and has been proven to offer clear or almost clear skin in 8 out of 10 patients within 16 weeks of treatment. Nearly 100% of response rates are maintained up to 5 years. It is a fully human monoclonal antibody neutralizing IL-17A and has demonstrated rapid, long-lasting efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and the more persistent manifestations of psoriasis, namely scalp, palms, soles and nails.

Bimekizumab Demonstrated Long-Term Maintenance of Complete or Almost Complete Skin Disease Resolution for Psoriasis Patients in BE ABLE 2 Extension Study

Quote:

---

UCB, a global biopharmaceutical company, presented positive data from the Phase 2b BE ABLE extension study of bimekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, which showed nearly all BE ABLE 1 responders completing 60 weeks of bimekizumab treatment maintained complete or almost complete skin clearance. The results are the longest-term data so far investigating bimekizumab and further highlight the potential value of the molecule’s unique dual mechanism of action, which potently and selectively neutralizes IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, two key cytokines driving inflammatory processes.

“The long-term results observed in the BE ABLE 2 Phase 2b study suggest the meaningful difference that IL-17F inhibition, along with IL-17A inhibition, can make for psoriasis patients who need significant, long-term skin clearance,” said Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, an investigator in the trial and President of Oregon Medical Research Center in Portland, Oregon. “The results add to a growing body of evidence supporting the molecule’s unique dual neutralization of both IL-17A and IL-17F cytokines across multiple inflammatory diseases, suggesting exciting potential.”

“Despite recent advances in therapy, psoriasis patients still have profound unmet needs. Many patients do not experience long-term symptom resolution, and they often have limited confidence in long-term treatments. The positive results and rapid development of bimekizumab in psoriasis reflect UCB’s dedication to connecting scientific innovation with greater patient value,” said Emmanuel Caeymaex, Head of Immunology and Executive Vice President at UCB.

In the BE ABLE 1 study, up to 79% of patients achieved at least 90% skin clearance (PASI90) as soon as week 12, based on a dose range of 64mg, 160mg, 160mg with a 320mg loading dose, 320mg, or 480mg, administered every four weeks. Among these BE ABLE 1 responders, defined as achievement of PASI90 at week 12, 80-100% maintained the rigorous PASI90 measure for up to an additional 48 weeks based on a dose range of 160mg or 320mg, administered every 4 weeks, in the BE ABLE 2 extension study. Further, 70-83% and 78-100% of BE ABLE 1 responders maintained PASI100 and the Investigator’s Global Assessment of response, respectively. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies, with no new safety findings observed. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were oral candidiasis and nasopharyngitis. No cases of suicidal ideation/behavior, major adverse cardiac events, or inflammatory bowel disease were reported.

UCB also presented findings this week from the BE AGILE study of bimekizumab in ankylosing spondylitis and the BE ACTIVE study of bimekizumab in psoriatic arthritis. The safety and efficacy of bimekizumab have not been established, and it is not approved by any regulatory authority worldwide.

Ilumya (tildrakizumab-asmn) has shown long term sustained ski clearance and cost effectiveness.

Quote:

---

Sun Pharma announced that one of its wholly owned subsidiaries presented new ILUMYA TM (tildrakizumab-asmn) clinical insights at the 2019 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Annual Meeting, including long-term data showing sustained skin clearance in some patients living with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after three years of ongoing treatment with ILUMYA TM.

These findings from the Phase 3 reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2 studies showed sustained response by some patients over time and ILUMYA TM was well tolerated with low rates of adverse events. After up to 5 years of treatment, all prespecified adverse events were reported at rates <1.6 and <1.3 events per 100 patient-years in reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2, respectively. Of the adverse events of interest, severe infections (1.2 and 1.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively) and malignancies (1.2 and 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively) were the most frequently reported. 1,2

The U.S. FDA approval of ILUMYA TM for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, who are candidates for systemic or phototherapy, is based on 64-week and 52-week reSURFACE data. “It’s very encouraging to see these effective response rates with ILUMYA TM over a three-year period, because as clinicians we’re often faced with the challenge of finding the right treatment that addresses the chronic nature of plaque psoriasis. We’re also starting to learn more about which patients ILUMYA TM may be a fit for,” said Dr. Andrew Blauvelt, board-certified dermatologist and President of Oregon Medical Research Center. “In a one-year analysis we saw that ILUMYA TM showed similar results of skin clearance in both patients who were new to biologic therapy and those who had previously been treated with another biologic. Furthermore, with its HCP administration model ILUMYA TM supports treatment adherence and may be a good treatment option for patients who are starting their first biologic treatment or those who have failed previous therapy.”

Results from bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients showed that treatment with ILUMYA TM achieved a PASI ≥50 response at Week 28 and was maintained or continued to increase at Week 52, regardless of the patient’s previous exposure to biologic treatment. Furthermore, additional one-year data analyses presented during the 2019 AAD Annual Meeting show that ILUMYA TM is similarly effective and safe for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients who have the common condition metabolic syndrome and those who do not. 4,5 People with psoriasis are predisposed to metabolic syndrome, and psoriasis has been shown to increase the prevalence of metabolic syndrome by three-fold. 6 Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with ILUMYA TM 100 mg who achieved PASI 75 at Week 52 were comparable between those with metabolic syndrome (84% [0.04]) and without (90% [0.02]) and reported similar adverse events, with no reports of cardiovascular events or diabetes worsening by metabolic syndrome status. 4,5 The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was infection, occurring in 50.6% [n=40] of patients with metabolic syndrome and 53.1% [n=154] of patients without. The most commonly reported serious adverse events (>1.5% of patients with ≥1 SAE) in patients with metabolic syndrome were gastrointestinal and cardiac disorders.

“As we expand our knowledge and understanding of the potential ILUMYA TM has for different patients, we’re excited to see the clinically meaningful benefits this treatment option may continue to offer,” said Abhay Gandhi, President and Chief Executive Officer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. “These insights are promising news for patients and clinicians, and we’re committed to helping those with moderate-to-severe psoriasis for whom ILUMYA TM may be a good treatment option.”

Additional analyses presented today used the 10-year Markov model to demonstrate the cost- effectiveness of ILUMYA TM as a first-line treatment. The data results demonstrated that ILUMYA TM is among the most cost-effective options compared to other biologic options including secukinumab,
guselkumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept.

The European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion for Skyrizi (risankizumab), an interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor, for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy.

Quote:

---

AbbVie a research-based global biopharmaceutical company, today announced that the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion for SKYRIZI™ (risankizumab), an investigational interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor, for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy.

The CHMP positive opinion is supported by data from the global Phase 3 psoriasis program evaluating more than 2,000 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis across four pivotal Phase 3 studies.1-3 Across all four studies, ultIMMA-1, ultIMMa-2, IMMhance and IMMvent, all co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints were met, achieving a significantly higher response of clear or almost clear skin (Static Physicians Global Assessment [sPGA] 0/1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 90) compared to ustekinumab, adalimumab and placebo at week 16 and up to week 52 (depending on study design). The most frequently reported adverse reactions were upper respiratory infections, which occurred in 13 percent of patients.5 Most reported adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity.

"Plaque psoriasis can have a significant physical, psychological and social burden on people living with the condition," said Michael Severino, M.D., vice chairman and president, AbbVie. "We are excited that the CHMP has recognized risankizumab's potential to significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of psoriasis and provide an improved quality of life. In clinical studies, risankizumab demonstrated consistently high rates of skin clearance with a favorable benefit/risk profile. At one year, more than 50 percent of patients receiving risankizumab achieved completely clear skin. This is an important regulatory milestone in our relentless pursuit of innovative therapies that address unmet needs for patients with serious dermatological conditions."

The CHMP positive opinion is a scientific recommendation for marketing authorization to the European Commission (EC), which will review it and issue a Commission decision, valid in all member states of the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. The Commission decision is anticipated within 67 days following the CHMP opinion.

BT (aka btinternet) in it's wisdom has decided to mark emails from Psoriasis Club as spam.

I thought it was a couple of members at first but it looks like BT have put something in place to maybe protect their users, but they are not doing it correctly and there is nothing I can do from this end.

I'm getting a bit fed up with trying to please all the email providers as Psoriasis Club never has and never will send Spam. We hate spam and anyone that knows me will tell you "there is no second chance if you Spam Psoriasis Club"

Hotmail is the worst email provider and maybe one I will ban in the near future. But now BT are starting to give us a bad name and making it look like it's the member.  

The way it is going with email problems lately I'm thinking of stopping all emails from Psoriasis Club. What does that mean?

#1 New members will have to apply for membership
#2 No notifications of new threads,posts,PMs, Etc
#3 No more newsletter

I'm sorry but it makes me so angry that I sit here working my ............. off keeping Psoriasis Club Spam free and email providers decide we are sending spam.



Feel like giving up.

Deep breath..........................

At the moment all I can say is as much as I don't like Google their Gmail accounts never give us problems, so get yourself a Gmail or a private account and things will work. I can't babysit your email account and if your's does keep marking us as spam then it will be you that makes Psoriasis Club become a private forum or worse still be gone from the internet.

Can I please remind all of our members that reporting the monthly newsletter as Spam is not helping anyone.

We have (and still do)work very hard to find a way of conforming to all spam protocols. We hate spam as much as you and that is why we often ban a lot of people from this website, but reporting an email from Psoriasis Club as spam is ................. well to be honest Dirty and Lazy on your part

Psoriasis Club is very proud of the way it treats it's members and there is no way that we would send Spam to anyone, it goes against our principles. Anyone feeling they have received Spam from Psoriasis Club is encouraged to contact us so we can at least try to resolve the problem.

The only Emails anyone can get from Psoriasis Club is by asking for them or they are sent for registration or from a reply to a contact.

When you register you are invited to subscribe to our monthly newsletter. It is your choice and if you choose to join the newsletter group, you can also choose to unsubscribe at anytime.

I am so disappointed to find today that two of our members have reported our newsletter as Spam. You opted in to receive it and you can opt out anytime you like, but reporting it as Spam is only going to get us a bad name.

You joined as a member for your own reasons and we hope you have found Psoriasis Club of interest. If it's not for you then don't worry as all accounts over 1 year old with zero posts are deleted. But if you did stay and subscribed to our newsletter then I respectfully ask that you Do Not report the newsletter as Spam. By doing so you are creating a problem and you could be preventing those that do want to see the newsletter each month from receiving it.

Yeah I know you are not reading this, but it makes me so angry that you joined Psoriasis Club and subscribed to the newsletter and you just got so lazy and instead of logging in to unsubscribe you reported it as Spam.

We are all volunteers and Jim especially puts a lot of effort into the newsletter each month, I myself also have a part to play as the buck stops here and I have to talk to our host and convince them that Psoriasis Club does not and will never send out spam.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I'm sorry but all you have to do is follow the link in the Email that you requested and unsubscribe.

*I appreciate that some members may  no longer need Psoriasis Club and have full respect for that choice, but please do not mark us as spam as you are only going to cause problems for those that were just like you.

Fred.

Hi, i thought it was worth a quick update as I have learnt a lot from reading other peoples experience on the site.
After 9 months on Otzela and finding it not having much effect I was prescribed Cosentyx. In the uK this is provided by a company called Healthcare At Home, who send a nurse out to show you how to inject yourself etc.
The first month is a loading dose of one dose (2 syringes) a week. By the end of this month my hands and nails had cleared and everything else was fading. You then go onto a monthly dose. Things improved up to 12 weeks and I was almost completely clear, brilliant! However at 16 weeks I have now got one or two patches coming back on my shins.
I have concluded that it works really well but maybe the maintenance dose is too low. This is possibly because the dose is not adjusted for body mass and I am over 100kg.
After seeing my consultant I am going to try Stelara as this allows an increased dose if over 100kg.
I'm still better than I have been for years and back to where I was on Fumiderm but without the side effects.
I'll try and update on the Stelara.

Hi, just an update from my intro. I was on Otzela for 9 months. No side effects to speak of but didn't do much for the Psoriasis so moved onto Cosentyx.