Sat-30-04-2016, 09:40 AM
(Sat-30-04-2016, 09:24 AM)Bill Wrote: Sorry, Dave. I did not mean to belittle anyone's sense of achievement against this crappy illness. I am more concerned with the assessment standards in clinical trials and the potential lack of objectivity in reporting results to patients for commercial gain. I have been slowly reducing my disease for nearly 3 1/2 years, and I believe that staying optimistic is of great importance. Against this I witnessed a few claims of "clear" that were far from "clear", and it did anger me a little, so for any offence caused I apologise. From my perspective, 100% is Michael Gambon in The Singing Detective.
Cheers,
Bill
No Bill I am just asking because I don't really know how the percentage is worked out, I have been in hospital three times with the dam P and the last time I was almost as bad as The Singing Detective apart from I did not have it all over my face just under where my beard was. That means that I would only be rated at around 96% ? coverage though again I am unsure how it's rated as I had several different types of P . I say at the moment I am 99% clear on the Stelara because I still have some P but not a lot in and around my ears and a couple of small patches that are almost gone as I am using Doverbet on them. I am ,as I say, just interested in how the P is rated and assessed ,anyway I am going off topic sorry Fred.