Psoriasis Club
  • Forum
  • Home
  • Portal
  • Member List
  • Psoriasis Score
  • PQOLS
  • What is psoriasis
  • Search
  • Help
Hello Guest, Welcome To The Psoriasis Club Forum. We are a self funded friendly group of people who understand.
Never be alone with psoriasis, come and join us. (Members see a lot more than you)
wave
Login Register
Login
Username:
Password:
Lost Password?
 
Psoriasis Club › HealthHealth Boards › Psoriasis In The News v
« Previous 1 … 29 30 31 32 33 … 54 Next »

NHS wasting millions on GP prescribed psoriasis treatments

Linear Mode
NHS wasting millions on GP prescribed psoriasis treatments
Fred Offline
I Wanted To Change the World But Got Up Far Too Late.
Moderator
Posts: 66,951
Threads: 3,888
Joined: Aug 2011
Gender: Male
Location: France
Psoriatic Arthritis Score: 1
PQOLS: 1
Treatment: Bimzelx / Coconut Oil
#1
News  Tue-08-12-2015, 12:02 PM
According to the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) the NHS UK are wasting millions of £s on GP's prescriptions for psoriasis. They estimate that the NHS could save around £2million a year if dermatology items listed were obtained from NHS manufacturers and not from pharmacists. For example, one treatment used for psoriasis, coal tar 10% ointment, is listed in the Tariff3 at £274.27, an item which is available from an NHS Specials manufacturer for £15.49 (a 17-fold increase, or an increase of 1670%).

Quote:
The British Association of Dermatologists is urging the government to revisit a policy that allows certain medicines prescribed by GPs to cost up to 17 times more than the same drugs prescribed in hospitals, needlessly wasting the NHS millions of pounds each year.

Most drugs prescribed by doctors are ‘licensed’ medicines which have been approved for sale in the UK. When suitable licensed medicines are not available, the Medicines Act allows doctors to prescribe unlicensed medicines. For many common skin diseases including psoriasis and eczema, the range of licensed medicines is limited. As a result, doctors rely greatly on unlicensed creams and ointments, known as special-order medicines, or ‘Specials’. Such medicines are commonplace in dermatology - the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), for example, recommends 39 Specials for use in skin disease treatment.

However, the BAD has learnt that prices for Specials when prescribed in the community, as opposed to in hospital, are up to 1670 per cent, or 17 times, higher than the same drugs for secondary (hospital) care patients. This huge cost to the NHS is resulting in patients being denied access to treatment, as GPs and the Clinical Commissioning Groups who oversee them are unable to justify such high costs. And the problem is not limited to dermatological Specials, with medicines for other disease areas also being prescribed at greatly inflated prices.

Specials on the Drugs Tariff

In England, when a community pharmacist supplies a patient with a medicine that has been prescribed by a GP, the pharmacist receives a payment from the NHS for this drug. The amount they receive is a set amount, specified in the ‘NHS Drug Tariff’,1 and nine of the dermatology Specials on the BAD’s recommended list of 39 are listed on this Tariff.

The price set out in this Tariff has been decided by the Department of Health, based on an average of costings provided only by members of the Association of Pharmaceutical Specials Manufacturers (APSM), all of whom are private companies, and the Tariff price does not take into account much cheaper quotes from NHS manufacturers.

However, the majority of dermatology Specials are made within NHS hospitals, by hospital manufacturing units, who provide Specials to the NHS at prices reflecting lower manufacturing costs. Among the reasons for the lower costs is the fact that these units are able to produce the medicines in large batches. Conversely, APSM members provide the same drugs at far higher prices, in part due to the bespoke, non-batch approach to the manufacturing.

This system means that in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, a whole-of-market quote has not been obtained for Specials, leading to excessively high prices charged to the NHS for these drugs.

Regardless of where a community pharmacist sources a Special medication from - be it a costly version from a private company or a cheaper version from an NHS manufacturing unit - the pharmacist receives the same reimbursement from the NHS as defined by the Tariff, allowing for large profit margins.

For example, one treatment used for psoriasis, coal tar 10% ointment, is listed in the Tariff3 at £274.27, an item which is available from an NHS Specials manufacturer for £15.49 (a 17-fold increase, or an increase of 1670%). Even allowing for some margin and procurement costs for supplying community pharmacists, a mark-up of £258.78 on an item costing £15.49 is wildly excessive. Salicylic acid 20% ointment (used to treat hard skin build-up in skin disease) is available for £27.25 from NHS manufacturers but has gone on Tariff at £246.93 (806% increase), while another medicine, salicylic acid 2% / sulfur 2% in aqueous cream, is available at £28.68 but has gone on Tariff at £215.85 (652% increase).

In Scotland, NHS Tariff prices are far lower, for example 5% coal tar ointment, used to treat psoriasis, is on the Scottish Tariff at £26.47 and on the English Tariff at £231.28, while 2% eosin solution (used for skin infections in leg ulcers) is listed at £27.60 versus £229.13 in England.

Dr Deirdre Buckley, Chairman of the Specials Working Group of the British Association of Dermatologists said: “The tariff-setting system used by the Department of Health in England relies on an arrangement with the APSM, a body representing only private manufacturers, rather than a mixture of NHS and private. An average of prices paid to members of the APSM, which are much higher than NHS manufacturers’ quotes, are used by the DH to decide the NHS Tariff price.

“The margins of over a thousand per cent attached to NHS Dermatology Special medicines during the Department of Health's tariff-setting process seem wildly excessive. It appears to us that the taxpayer is being overcharged for the sole benefit of community pharmacists and some private Specials pharmaceutical manufacturers, or more worryingly, our patients are denied the medications they need because they are too expensive.”

The British Association of Dermatologists acknowledges that the current tariff-setting process, put in place by the Department of Health in 2011, has led to savings for the NHS, but is asking the government to review the process in light of the highlighted issues, and to ensure further cost savings by including NHS manufacturing units in the equation.

Source: bad.org.uk
Quote
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
NHS wasting millions on GP prescribed psoriasis treatments - by Fred - Tue-08-12-2015, 12:02 PM
RE: NHS wasting millions on GP prescribed psoriasis treatments - by jiml - Tue-08-12-2015, 12:27 PM
RE: NHS wasting millions on GP prescribed psoriasis treatments - by Caroline - Tue-08-12-2015, 22:00 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
News Cardiovascular safety of systemic psoriasis treatments cohort study Fred 4 417 Thu-01-05-2025, 12:53 PM
Last Post: Fred
News Systemic treatments for psoriasis & infections in older patients Fred 0 339 Thu-20-03-2025, 14:56 PM
Last Post: Fred
News TNF psoriasis treatments and fungal infections Fred 1 464 Tue-11-03-2025, 16:10 PM
Last Post: Forest Walker
News Some are super responders to biologic treatments for psoriasis Fred 3 3,778 Sat-16-04-2022, 20:00 PM
Last Post: D Foster
News Taltz vs seven other bio treatments for psoriasis Fred 0 2,272 Sat-24-04-2021, 11:26 AM
Last Post: Fred



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
    About | Contact us | Login | Register | Home | Cookies/GDPR | RSS Syndication | Portal | Types Of Psoriasis | Psoriasis Score | Members Only Boards
    Copyright © 2010 - 2025 Psoriasis Club | All Rights Reserved | Founded May 2010 | Psoriasis Club Is Self Funded Without Sponsors Or Donations | Software by MyBB | Social
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode