Sun-26-10-2014, 23:23 PM
(Sun-26-10-2014, 13:22 PM)Caroline Wrote: That's interesting. It is "likely" better, so it could be but also could not be. There is no indication to what other treatments they compared it. If the competitor is MTX, then I am quite sure it is better, but if it is DMF, then it is likely that it it's not likely.
There is no comparison material visible in this conclusion, so it is likely that we as receivers of this study are a bit critical on this conclusive message.
The range is also over only 1 year... Elderly people can be much older than 66.
The probable likelihood that you have a credible plausible and believable comment could be odds-on Likely.