Fri-20-04-2018, 05:47 AM
With my reintroduction, rather than having 2 portions for 2 days and observing for 2 days, would I be better to add it back and leave it there until/if I get a flare up?
If the 4 day test can successfully tell me that this is not a problem food there is no reason to not permanently reintroduce it. Then when I get a flare up I will remove the food that I am testing in this 4 day window.
If the 4 day test is not successful enough to tell me that this is a problem food, then if removing food from the current window does not calm it down, I will remove the food from the previous window and continue back until it stops to flare.
Otherwise, I could spend a month reintroducing everything with no reaction, then add them all back in and I get a flare and have no idea what it is.
Is this logical thinking or would anybody recommend against it?
If the 4 day test can successfully tell me that this is not a problem food there is no reason to not permanently reintroduce it. Then when I get a flare up I will remove the food that I am testing in this 4 day window.
If the 4 day test is not successful enough to tell me that this is a problem food, then if removing food from the current window does not calm it down, I will remove the food from the previous window and continue back until it stops to flare.
Otherwise, I could spend a month reintroducing everything with no reaction, then add them all back in and I get a flare and have no idea what it is.
Is this logical thinking or would anybody recommend against it?