Fri-24-11-2017, 07:43 AM
(Fri-24-11-2017, 07:35 AM)Hanna Wrote:(Thu-23-11-2017, 23:04 PM)jiml Wrote:(Thu-23-11-2017, 23:01 PM)Caroline Wrote:(Thu-23-11-2017, 22:58 PM)jiml Wrote: Hi Hanna if you do decide to go for the DMF option, all I can tell you is it has given me 6 great years without a flare up .....I'm not saying it will work fast or that it will be without side effects when you start ....but if you can get your head round those facts it's a great drug
But if you can get a bio that's possibly less hassle ......but if I were given the choice again I would still choose DMF as you are still young I would say exhaust all other avenues first and save the bios for later in life
The side effects, in casu the toxity, may even be less if you go for Skilarence instead of Fumaderm. Just a thought.
I agree that's why I didn't mention Fumaderm ...hopefully Skilarence will be offered
Now you've put this, she did go to give me info on skil but it wasnt on her system. (Still a newish drug??)
Morning Hanna,
Yes, it is quite new.
Has just been accepted and registered for the European market. I thought they would start to deliver in the UK first, per 1st of January. I have seen the price coming around here on the forum. See the thread on Skilarence. Yes, I just found my post on it RE: [split] Skilarence
It is new in the sense that it is a competitor of Fumaderm, it has only one ingredient DMF. In that sense it is an old drug, it doesn’t differ from drugs that are 20 years and longer available, but are not registered. It is a formal thing.